THOMAS ARTHUR FIGHT FOR LIFE

Home

Case History

Links to Motions Filed

The Innocence Project

DNA & Death Penalty News

Interviews & You Tube

How You Can Help

AEDPA ACT

Additional Resource Links

Contact Us & Comments

Arthur's Daughter Page

Forgotten Victims & Crime

 
Image: 
                    April 15, 2009 Court Ordered DNA test results are in!!!!
                                             
See DNA Test Results
             Thomas Arthur's DNA Not Present On Crime Scene Evidence!!!!!
                           STATE OF ALABAMA TO SET NEW EXECUTION DATE

Ignoring recent DNA results , the State of Alabama is moving forward with a new execution date. See all recent motions by clicking on "Links to Motions Filed" link to the left.

1.  Thomas Arthur has sat on Alabama's death row for over 25 years for murdering   
     Troy Wicker, and he has always maintained his innocence.  

2.  He has been scheduled for execution 4 times. Hair and finger prints found at the
     crime scene did not match him. No physical evidence linked him to the murder. 
     No murder weapon was ever found.  Eye witnesses said he was 75 miles away
     when the murder was committed.  Recent DNA testing of the crime scene evidence 
     came back negative for Thomas Arthur.

3. The state's key witness, the victims wife, Judy Wicker (Mary Turner now) was
     convicted of murdering her husband for $90,000.00 of insurance money. She
     was given a life sentence.In 7 sworn statements while under oath, Judy Wicker 
     testified Thomas Arthur had nothing to do with the murder.

4. Judy and her sister Theresa were both found at the crime scene with blood on
    theirclothes.  Neither woman were tested for GSR (Gun Shot residue) to see if
    they had fired a weapon. The bloody clothes  have never been DNA tested to
    see if Troy Wicker's blood was on them.

5. After serving 10 years in prison Judy Wicker was released from prison in exchange
    for a new testimony to say Thomas Arthur killed her husband. She also changed
    her testimony to say Thomas Arthur beat her up and killed her husband. In the
    original interviews, Judy Wicker stated Thomas Arthur had sex with her after
    killing her husband. This version changed after the interviews and police never
    charged Thomas Arthur with rape. Judy Wickers statements disappeared from the
    records along with much of the physical evidence.

6.  Investigators ignored key evidence and did not disclose key evidence that could
     of proven Thomas Arthurs innocence. This conviction was based on very weak
     circumstantial evidence and the key witness is a convicted murderer and has
     committed perjury. 

7.  Thomas Arthur has never had his 1st habeas corpus review. 
   
8.  Thomas Arthur's most recent execution scheduled for July 31, 2008 was stayed
     by the Alabama Supreme Court after the stay had already been denied by the
     Alabama Supreme Court. 
Another man, Bobby Ray Gilbert said that he committed
     the murder not Thomas Arthur.
Read Confession  
The July 31st, 2008 execution 
     was stayed based on the confession of Bobby Ray Gilbert. A hearing was scheduled
     for April 15th, 2009 in Jefferson County Circuit Court before Judge Theresa 
     Pulliam. After hearing testimony from Bobby Ray Gilbert and several others, 
     Judge Pulliam ordered DNA testing on 3 pieces of physical evidence that was 
     collectedat the crime scene in 1982. The three pieces of evidence were clothing
     worn by the victims wife, Judy Wicker, a wig prosecutors  and Judy Wicker said 
     Thomas Arthur wore before, during and after the murder, and a single strand of hair
     found at the crime scene on Judy Wickers shoe. Other key pieces of physical 
     evidence were not available for testing, including a rape kit, because the State had 
     lost them. On July 10th, 2009, DNA test results were turned over to Judge Pulliam.

9.    Judge Pulliam "sealed" the test results and prevented the defense from disclsoing
      results.

10.   August 10, 2009, Judge Pulliam ruled Bobby Ray Gilbert lied and that DNA test
       results proved he was not at the crime scene and could not have committed the
       murder. She also ruled Thomas Arthur perpetrated fraud against the court and
       provided Bobby Ray Gilbert with information to aid in his confession. There was
       no evidence to prove Thomas Arthur provided information to Bobby Ray Gilbert. 
       However, lets assume he did provide information to Gilbert.  What would this 
       prove? It would prove Thomas Arthur was attempting to prove his innocence 
       in the only way he could, to have the DNA tested.  The courts would not allow
       him to test the DNA evidence simply because of his claims of  innocence. Even
       the United States Supreme Court has ruled this year DNA testing to prove your 
       innocence is not a constitutional right.  

11.  The most crucial piece of evidence, the wig worn by the killer could not be DNA
       tested by Alabama'sForensic Department becuase they lack the advanced
       equipment needed for the test. Arthur requested that the wig be tested by a
       more advnaced lab at the defense's expense.  Pulliam denied the request. 

Bobby Ray Gilbert's DNA was not present at the crime scene. 
Neither was Thomas Arthur's.
                                           ****That is a fact that cannot be ignored.***   

It makes one wonder, if DNA test results prove one man was not at the crime scene and is lying about committing this murder, then how is it possible those same DNA test results cannot confirm Thomas Arthur was not at the crime scene? How can the same DNA test results say one man was not there and then say the other man was there?   DNA test results were the same for both men...    negative.



Additional DNA Evidence that includes blood, hair and semen was recovered and still 
exists, but it has never been DNA tested!!! 
Yet the State of Alabama not only REFUSES to DNA test the crime scene evidence---
but it is refusing to allow Arthur to have the evidence DNA tested at HIS EXPENSE!!!   
                               See all the Evidence Collected By The State of Alabama 






Note:
The same day as the confession and the stay of execution the state of Alabama's
attorney general, Troy King and Clay Crenshaw claimed a rape kit and other physical
evidence collected at the crime scene in 1982 is missing. After all these years of Thomas Arthurs defense team trying to obtain it, it is now missing. Troy King also stated to the
media the DNA would not have matched Thomas Arthur anyway. King said Arthur
had planted all the DNA evidence. This stunned legal professionals especially since
DNA testing was not around in 1982 when the murder was committed. 

           
      SIGN PETITION ASKING THAT THOMAS ARTHUR BE GRANTEDA NEW TRIAL 
 
 
     
   The Innocence Project based in New York is involved in Thomas Arthurs case. They are assisting Thomas Arthurs attorneys and have written many letter and filed multiple motions on Arthurs behalf. Click on the Innocence Project link for more information. 
              
   There are many prominent organizations that have requested DNA testing in Arthur's case.  The Innocence Project in New York, Amnesty International, The Saint 'Egidio Community, The Justice Institute, for the wrongfully convicted, DER/SPIEGEL, former Governor Jim Petro, Alabama Senator Hank Sanders, Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama, Sister Helen Prejean. There are many other organizations involved in demanding DNA testing in Arthur's case.  Project Hope to Abolish the death penalty,  National Coalition to Abolish the death penalty, Florida support groups, The Patrick Crusade, are among the many organizations that have been involved.  There are many individuals who are helping on a personal level.  There are to many to name them all.  Literally tens of thousands of United States Citizens, and people around the World have written or called on Arthur's behalf. 
  

Counter
                                 Copyright, Sherrie Stone, Inc.

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®

Everyone Deserves A Fair Judical System